La Audiencia Nacional española resolvió que los tribunales de España son competentes para investigar por terrorismo y por lesa humanidad el asesinato de cinco jesuitas españoles en 1989.
Archives
Audiencia Nacional española ordena que el caso jesuitas se investigue como crimen contra la humanidad
- October 3, 2014
Hace siete meses una reforma en España obligó al juez que ventila la causa contra los asesinos de los jesuitas a que solo los investigara por terrorismo y no por crimen de lesa humanidad, como originalmente el mismo juez lo había calificado.
Audiencia Nacional española ordena que el caso jesuitas se investigue como crimen contra la humanidad
- October 3, 2014
Hace siete meses una reforma en España obligó al juez que ventila la causa contra los asesinos de los jesuitas a que solo los investigara por terrorismo y no por crimen de lesa humanidad, como originalmente el mismo juez lo había calificado. Asimismo, no podía juzgarlos por el asesinato de las víctimas salvadoreñas: uno de los sacerdotes, una empleada y la hija de esta. El máximo tribunal español ordenó hoy que el caso vuelva a tratarse como al inicio.
Expert Report of Terry Karl Released
- October 2, 2014
The U.S. government released the expert report of Stanford professor Terry Karl, which was used in the removal proceedings against former Salvadoran Minster of Defense Garcia. Professor Karl’s report was a basis for the immigration judge’s ruling that
Sainthood isn’t Enough for Salvadoran Archbishop Óscar Romero
- September 5, 2014
In 2003, CJA filed a lawsuit against former Salvadoran Air Force captain Alvaro Saravia for his role in the assassination of Archbishop Óscar Romero. Although we obtained a judgment against him in a U.S. District Court for crimes against humanity, Saravia fled and is now in hiding. In this beautiful op-ed, Mary Jo McConahay explains why Archbishop Romero deserves justice as much as sainthood.
Verdict in Cambodia: Too Little Too Late but Still Important
- August 9, 2014
Amidst all the developments in the Middle East, we could not allow the verdict rendered by the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) in Case 002 to go unacknowledged. Case 002 involves two surviving Khmer Rouge defendants: Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea. As the evidence against these two was overwhelming, it comes as no surprise that the defendants were convicted of crimes against humanity and sentenced to life imprisonment—a penalty with limited meaning when it comes to octogenarian defendants.
Khmer Rouge Verdicts Offer Bittersweet Relief to SoCal Cambodians
- August 7, 2014
Decades after the rule of Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge ended, a U.N.-backed war crimes tribunal sentenced two top leaders of the former regime to life in prison on war crimes charges for their roles during the country’s 1970s terror. CJA Staff Attorney Nushin Sarkarati comments on the verdict.
Miles Away and Years On, Cambodians Relish Verdict
- August 7, 2014
CJA client Sophany Bay and CJA Staff Attorney Nushin Sarkarati react to verdict for Case 002/1 against senior officials from the Khmer Rouge regime.
Cambodia Verdicts Send a “Warning to War Criminals”
- August 7, 2014
CJA Staff Attorney Nushin Sarkarati represents Khmer Rouge victims before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Sarkarati talked to The National Law Journal about the court’s decision to sentence two senior Khmer Rouge officials to life imprisonment.
Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea Found Guilty
- August 7, 2014
On August 7, 2014, the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Phnom Penh, known as the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), found Khieu Samphan and Nuon Chea guilty of crimes against humanity. The Court also awarded reparations to the 3,866 Civil Parties participating in the case. This is the tribunal’s first judgment against senior leaders of the Khmer Rouge regime for atrocities committed. CJA represents 45 U.S.-based Civil Parties before the ECCC. Click here to read more.